Poll: Vote for action under Rev4 § 13(2)(d)
This poll is closed.
Group 1: No server ban
6.25%
1 6.25%
Group 1: Ban server
37.50%
6 37.50%
Group 2: No client action
6.25%
1 6.25%
Group 2: Ban client
25.00%
4 25.00%
Group 2: Mute client
25.00%
4 25.00%
Total 16 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
[Banned] imposter/noname
08-22-2013, 09:24 AM, (This post was last modified: 09-07-2013, 05:17 PM by Victor.)
#1
[Banned] imposter/noname
IP: 186.213.50.238

Reason: This guy imposters anyone and everyone, then goes around insulting and spamming the server.

Another fine Irish man brought down by the damn bottle... -Chips
08-22-2013, 09:55 AM,
#2
RE: Ban - imposter/noname
He also seems to have the server 208.115.226.211 under his control. He has insulting bot names in that server, and restarts it if I connect. He also blacklisted me for no reason.

I think muting him will be more effective than a ban.

Best regards,
Victor
//victorz.ca
Code:
Your antithesis compares favorably with any high magnitude of pwnage. (-you > |p|, you < -|p|)
My antithesis compares favorably with _that of_ any high magnitude of pwnage. (|-me| > |-p|, |me| > |p|)
08-22-2013, 10:14 AM,
#3
RE: Ban - imposter/noname
Like a MS mute on all servers?

Another fine Irish man brought down by the damn bottle... -Chips
08-22-2013, 10:18 AM,
#4
RE: Ban - imposter/noname
Yeah, we actually have that capability already.

Best regards,
Victor
//victorz.ca
Code:
Your antithesis compares favorably with any high magnitude of pwnage. (-you > |p|, you < -|p|)
My antithesis compares favorably with _that of_ any high magnitude of pwnage. (|-me| > |-p|, |me| > |p|)
08-22-2013, 06:04 PM,
#5
RE: Ban - imposter/noname
do that then

Another fine Irish man brought down by the damn bottle... -Chips
08-24-2013, 06:53 AM,
#6
RE: Ban - imposter/noname
kick him in his ass, he really begs to do so...
sorry, but he (if he is the one i think him to be) is a f#cking idiot

The C Programming Language: combines the flexibility of assembly language with the power of assembly language.
08-24-2013, 08:17 AM,
#7
RE: Ban - imposter/noname
2.5.9 is out now, so just add him to the server mutelist. He might even earn a global mute.

Best regards,
Victor
//victorz.ca
Code:
Your antithesis compares favorably with any high magnitude of pwnage. (-you > |p|, you < -|p|)
My antithesis compares favorably with _that of_ any high magnitude of pwnage. (|-me| > |-p|, |me| > |p|)
08-24-2013, 08:09 PM,
#8
RE: Ban - imposter/noname
Now I request a ban. http://i1324.photobucket.com/albums/u603...53c272.png

Another fine Irish man brought down by the damn bottle... -Chips
08-25-2013, 10:08 AM,
#9
RE: Ban - imposter/noname
We don't really have any rules governing the bot names, but maybe it should just be removed, or made client-side.

However, making it server-side provides consistency, so every client sees the same name of the bot being killed.

Best regards,
Victor
//victorz.ca
Code:
Your antithesis compares favorably with any high magnitude of pwnage. (-you > |p|, you < -|p|)
My antithesis compares favorably with _that of_ any high magnitude of pwnage. (|-me| > |-p|, |me| > |p|)
08-25-2013, 10:16 AM,
#10
RE: Ban - imposter/noname
It should be client side.

Another fine Irish man brought down by the damn bottle... -Chips


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)