Cube Licence Clarification
|
2013-08-09, 02:51 PM
(This post was last modified: 2013-08-11, 04:26 PM by Victor.)
|
|||
|
|||
Cube Licence Clarification
I Wrote:AssaultCube is a mod of Cube, licenced under the Cube licence. It is the same as the zLib licence, but includes this clause: Dang it... I forgot the salutation and signature... Quote:Clearly that is transitive, i.e. a mod of Cube is built on the Cube source, so it falls under the Cube license, so cannot change its license either. I Wrote:Dear Wouter van Oortmerssen: I Wrote:Dear Wouter van Oortmerssen: I Wrote:Dear Wouter van Oortmerssen: Quote:The whole point of BSD style licenses (like ZLIB, en thus the Cube license) in contrast to the GPL is that source code does NOT need to be provided. I Wrote:But why don't you want to force derivative works to release the source? Don't you want to make it so that their improvements can be easily backported to your original software? Quote:No, I don't. If you want to learn about why people choose BSD style licenses over the GPL, there are endless resources about that online. Best regards,
Victor //victorz.ca Code: Your antithesis compares favorably with any high magnitude of pwnage. (-you > |p|, you < -|p|) |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Cube Licence Clarification - by Victor - 2013-08-09, 02:51 PM
RE: [In Progress] Cube Licence Clarification - by DeltaStrikeOp - 2013-08-09, 03:46 PM
RE: [In Progress] Cube Licence Clarification - by Victor - 2013-08-09, 06:14 PM
RE: [In Progress] Cube Licence Clarification - by ruler501 - 2013-08-09, 06:20 PM
RE: [In Progress] Cube Licence Clarification - by Victor - 2013-08-09, 06:32 PM
RE: Cube Licence Clarification - by dm.mossberg590a1 - 2013-08-09, 08:30 PM
RE: Cube Licence Clarification - by Victor - 2013-08-11, 02:47 PM
RE: Cube Licence Clarification - by forumlurker007 - 2013-11-13, 07:04 PM
RE: Cube Licence Clarification - by dm.mossberg590a1 - 2013-11-13, 07:19 PM
RE: Cube Licence Clarification - by forumlurker007 - 2013-11-13, 07:24 PM
|